All manuscripts submitted to JLHRS : Journal of Law and Human Rights Studies undergo a peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and academic contribution of the published articles.

Initial Editorial Review

Each submitted manuscript will first be evaluated by the editorial team to assess its suitability with the journal’s focus and scope, writing quality, research originality, and compliance with the author guidelines. Manuscripts that do not meet the journal standards may be rejected without external review.

Double-Blind Peer Review

JLHRS applies a double-blind peer review process in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential throughout the review process. This system is intended to maintain objectivity, fairness, and academic integrity.

Reviewer Evaluation

The manuscript will be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on several aspects, including:

1. Originality and novelty of the research
2. Relevance to the journal’s focus and scope
3. Clarity of objectives and research methods
4. Quality of analysis and discussion
5. Contribution to legal and human rights scholarship
6. Accuracy of references and citations
7. Overall academic quality and readability

Review Decision

Based on the reviewers’ comments and recommendations, the editor may decide to:

1. Accept the manuscript without revision
2. Accept the manuscript with minor revisions
3. Request major revisions and resubmission
4. Reject the manuscript

Authors will be informed of the review results and may be asked to revise their manuscripts according to the reviewers’ and editors’ suggestions.

Revision Process

Authors are expected to submit revised manuscripts within the time specified by the editorial team. Revised manuscripts may be returned to the reviewers for further evaluation if necessary.

Final Decision

The final decision regarding manuscript acceptance is made by the Editor-in-Chief based on reviewers’ recommendations, editorial evaluation, and the manuscript’s compliance with the journal’s publication standards.

Publication Ethics

All reviewers are expected to conduct the review process objectively, professionally, and confidentially, while avoiding conflicts of interest and maintaining academic integrity throughout the review process.