All manuscripts submitted to Laciva: Lampung Civil Law Journal undergo a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and academic integrity of the published articles. In this process, the identities of both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous.

The review process consists of the following stages:

1. Initial Editorial Screening
   The Editorial Board evaluates each submitted manuscript to ensure that it complies with the journal's focus and scope, formatting requirements, and publication ethics. Manuscripts that do not meet these requirements may be returned to the authors or rejected without external review.
2. Plagiarism Screening
   All manuscripts are screened using plagiarism detection software before proceeding to the peer review stage.
3. Double-Blind Peer Review
   Eligible manuscripts are assigned to at least two independent reviewers with expertise relevant to the manuscript's subject area. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on originality, scientific contribution, methodology, legal analysis, clarity, organization, relevance, and the quality of references.
4. Review Recommendations
   Based on the reviewers' comments, the editor will make one of the following decisions:
   • Accept without revision
   • Accept with minor revisions
   • Accept with major revisions
   • Reject
5. Revision by Authors
   Authors are required to revise their manuscripts in accordance with the reviewers' comments and submit a revised version within the specified timeframe.
6. Final Editorial Decision
   The Editor-in-Chief makes the final publication decision after considering the reviewers' recommendations and the quality of the revised manuscript.

Throughout the review process, Laciva: Lampung Civil Law Journal is committed to maintaining confidentiality, fairness, objectivity, and transparency in accordance with the ethical principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).